SAE AMS5879 Nickel Alloy, Corrosion and Heat-Resistant, Sheet, Strip, and Foil, 62Ni - 21.5Cr - 9.0Mo - 3.7Cb, Cold Roll
时间:2024-05-16 07:50:35 来源: 标准资料网 作者：标准资料网 阅读：8231
Product Code:SAE AMS5879
Title:Nickel Alloy, Corrosion and Heat-Resistant, Sheet, Strip, and Foil, 62Ni - 21.5Cr - 9.0Mo - 3.7Cb, Cold Rolled and Annealed
Issuing Committee:Ams F Corrosion Heat Resistant Alloys Committee
Scope:This specification covers a corrosion and heat-resistant nickel alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and foil 0.100 inch (2.54 mm) and under in nominal thickness.
【英文标准名称】:Tall-oilfattyacidsforpaintsandvarnishes-Specificationsandtestmethods(ISO8623:1997)
【原文标准名称】:油漆和清漆用高脂油脂肪酸.规范和试验方法
【标准号】:DINISO8623-1998
【标准状态】:作废
【国别】:德国
【发布日期】:1998-08
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:德国标准化学会(DE-DIN)
【起草单位】:
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:脂肪酸;粘合剂;涂料;天然漆;检验;木浆浮油;涂层材料;材料规范;清漆;规范(验收);材料;作标记;试验;交货条件;定义;验收规范
【英文主题词】:Acceptancespecification;Bindingagents;Coatingmaterials;Definition;Definitions;Deliveryconditions;Fattyacids;Inspection;Lacquers;Marking;Materials;Materialsspecification;Paints;Specification(approval);Talloil;Testing;Varnishes
【摘要】:Thedocumentspecifiestherequirementsandthecorrespondingtestmethodsfordistilledtall-oilfattyacidsforpaintsandvarnishes.
【中国标准分类号】:G51
【国际标准分类号】:87_060_20
【页数】:6P.;A4
【正文语种】:德语
【英文标准名称】:StandardPracticeforTestingForcedEntryResistanceofSecurityFenceSystems
【原文标准名称】:安全防护系统防强行侵入性能的标准测试规程
【标准号】:ASTMF2781-2009
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:
【发布日期】:2009
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:美国材料与试验协会(US-ASTM)
【起草单位】:F14.50
【标准类型】:(Practice)
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:
【英文主题词】:
【摘要】:Thesuccessorfailureofanyattempttoforcefullypenetrateafencesystemisdependentuponthreeprimaryfactorsthatcollectivelydefinethethreatx2014;thetoolsanddevicesemployed,thenumberofaggressors,andtheirlevelofsophistication.Normally,atestprocedureofthisscopewouldbesupportedbyyearsoflaboratorytestingintendedtoqualifyandaccuratelyreproducethedestructiveeffectsofavarietyoftools,implements,anddevices.However,rapidlychangingsocialconditionshavecreatedanimmediateneedforbuildingcomponentsresistanttoevolvingforcedentrytechniques.Accordingly,theprocedurespresentedhereinarebasedmoreonfieldexperiencethanlaboratoryanalysis.Theyaremorerepresentativethaninclusive,areintendedtoprovideabasisforthecomparativeevaluationofdifferentfencesystemsusingforcedpenetrationproceduresandarenotintendedtobeusedtoestablishorconfirmtheabsolutepreventionofforcedentries.TABLE1ScheduleofTestingx2014;AllLevelsofThreatSeverity